Mar 02, 2016 - Wednesday

Wednesday Afternoon Colonial GOLD RUS Event Summary

Session

36.5 Tables

Players

Leaderboards

 

mps Color 7 3 Overall Score % Player 1 Player 2 Personal
Scores
1.53 Gold 1 1 114.50 68.15 Vaishali JategaonkarKinnelon, NJ Helen WaldropOcracoke, NC Scores
1.07 Red 2 2 109.50 65.18 James MarinoNewtown, PA Kathleen MarinoNewtown, PA Scores
1.53 Gold 3 108.00 64.29 Michael HarveyWilliamsburg, VA Sarah StevensWilliamsburg, VA Scores
1.45 Gold 4 3 103.50 61.61 Diane CarletonMidlothian, VA Carolyn HarmonMechanicsville, VA Scores
1.45 Gold 5/6 102.00 60.71 Parke MessierRichmond, VA Catherine StraussRichmond, VA Scores
1.07 Red 5/6 102.00 60.71 Lorne GinnTowson, MD Linda WishTowson, MD Scores
1.02 Red 7 100.50 59.82 Judith OwenWinchester, VA Sharon BowenBerryville, VA Scores
1.45 Gold 8 4 97.50 58.04 Juanita AllisonBethel Park, PA David AllisonBethel Park, PA Scores
1.45 Gold 9 5 96.98 57.73 Jane RiddleMidlothian, VA Karen HamlettGlen Allen, VA Scores
1.02 Red 10/11 96.50 57.44 Hannah GallierRichmond, VA Sharon IrishRichmond, VA Scores
0.73 Red 10/11 96.50 57.44 John PeguesWarrenton, VA Warren BeetonHaymarket, VA Scores
1.45 Gold 12 6 96.00 57.14 Cheri HayesWashington, DC Jane DolkartWashington, DC Scores
1.02 Red 13 95.50 56.85 Peter TallmanLouisville, CO Ellen TallmanLouisville, CO Scores
1.45 Gold 14 94.63 56.33 Carol FletcherCharlotte, NC Patsy RidgePineville, NC Scores
1.02 Red 15 94.50 56.25 Fred LongLancaster, PA Kasey LongLancaster, PA Scores
0.92 Red 16 7 94.00 55.95 Barbara MaffeiAnnapolis, MD Martha RiviereAnnapolis, MD Scores
1.02 Red 17 8 93.94 55.92 Teresa WalshRichmond, VA Jo Anne HutzlerRichmond, VA Scores
0.73 Red 18 93.50 55.65 Bob BellBarrie, ON Gwynne BellBarrie, ON Scores
0.51 Red 19 92.50 55.06 Gretchen BlakeyBroadway, VA Churchill BlakeyBroadway, VA Scores
1.02 Red 20 9 91.95 54.73 Margaret MaconRichmond, VA Mary RabbRichmond, VA Scores
0.73 Red 21 10 91.66 54.56 Joan BrockenbroughWilliamsburg, VA Dale YagedCharlotte, NC Scores
0.73 Red 22 11 91.50 54.46 Kathleen HaglichVirginia Beach, VA Amy BrissonArlington, VA Scores
0.51 Red 23 91.44 54.43 Perry MitchellOcean View, DE Meir KendeRockville, MD Scores
0.73 Red 24 91.00 54.17 Ruth ShilkretArnold, MD Reggie RayGambrills, MD Scores
0.73 Red 25 89.83 53.47 Claiborne JenkinsRichmond, VA Juan PardoSilver Spring, MD Scores
0.64 Red 26 12 89.50 53.27 Gail CervarichPortsmouth, VA Sid CervarichPortsmouth, VA Scores
0.77 Red 27 89.00 52.98 Louise RaglandNewport News, VA Kay HughesNewport News, VA Scores
0.51 Red 28 88.50 52.68 Joanne LivingstonGlen Allen, VA Thomas MullerRock Hill, SC Scores
0.51 Red 29 87.52 52.10 Donna HicklingFalls Church, VA Francesca MazarellaAlexandria, VA Scores
0.00 30 87.00 51.79 Charles Young JrPinehurst, NC Ina YoungPinehurst, NC Scores
0.98 Red 31 13 86.50 51.49 Katherine BaerChapel Hill, NC Beth WatsonChapel Hill, NC Scores
0.77 Red 32 14 86.00 51.19 John SchoeberleinVienna, VA Julie SchoeberleinVienna, VA Scores
0.54 Red 33/34 85.50 50.89 Jacqueline DoyleMathews, VA Mary BollingerWilliamsburg, VA Scores
0.00 33/34 85.50 50.89 Sherry GriffinAlexandria, VA George SchroppPotomac Falls, VA Scores
0.69 Red 35/36 15 85.00 50.60 Arthur FlemingWilliamsburg, VA Robert Van DuyneWilliamsburg, VA Scores
0.00 35/36 85.00 50.60 Dianne HalePittsboro, NC Kay CrawfordGreenville, NC Scores
0.00 37 84.49 50.29 Susan GallaherFulks Run, VA Thomas GallaherFulks Run, VA Scores
0.00 16 82.50 49.11 Hank LavenderBurke, VA Diane WoodworthFalls Church, VA Scores
0.00 17 81.50 48.51 Lorraine ShumakerFairfax Station, VA Ann HunterBurke, VA Scores

Recaps

  • Select a section:
  • M
  • N
  • Q
  • R

Section M

NS

Pair Player 1 Player 2 Flt Qual Overall Section Session
Score
% Carry
Over
Adjust Overall
Score
mps Color Next
Session
Personal
Scores
7 3 7 3
6 Vaishali Jategaonkar Helen Waldrop 3 1 1 - 1 1 - 68.15 114.50 1.53 Gold Q - 6 - E/W Scores
4 James Marino Kathleen Marino 3 2 2 - 2 2 - 65.18 109.50 1.07 Red Q - 4 - E/W Scores
2 John Schoeberlein Julie Schoeberlein 3 32 14 - 3 - - 51.19 86.00 0.77 Red Q - 2 - E/W Scores
5 Jacqueline Doyle Mary Bollinger 7 33/34 - - 4 - - 50.89 85.50 0.54 Red Q - 5 - E/W Scores
9 Dianne Hale Kay Crawford 7 35/36 - - - - - 50.60 85.00 Q - 9 - E/W Scores
7 Hank Lavender Diane Woodworth 3 - 16 - - - - 49.11 82.50 Q - 7 - E/W Scores
10 Martha Buell Peggy Barron 7 - - - - - - 45.24 76.00 Q - 10 - E/W Scores
3 James Warren Ruth Warren 7 - - - - - - 41.67 70.00 Q - 3 - E/W Scores
1 John Barnard Charlotte Barnard 3 - - - - - - 39.29 66.00 Q - 1 - E/W Scores
8 Patricia McFeely Susan Ingelbinck 3 - - - - - - 38.69 65.00 Q - 8 - E/W Scores

EW

Pair Player 1 Player 2 Flt Qual Overall Section Session
Score
% Carry
Over
Adjust Overall
Score
mps Color Next
Session
Personal
Scores
7 3 7 3
5 Michael Harvey Sarah Stevens 7 3 - - 1 - - 64.29 108.00 1.53 Gold M - 5 - N/S Scores
1 Lorne Ginn Linda Wish 7 5/6 - - 2 - - 60.71 102.00 1.07 Red M - 1 - N/S Scores
7 Louise Ragland Kay Hughes 7 27 - - 3 - - 52.98 89.00 0.77 Red M - 7 - N/S Scores
6 Katherine Baer Beth Watson 3 31 13 - 4 1 - 51.49 86.50 0.98 Red M - 6 - N/S Scores
4 Arthur Fleming Robert Van Duyne 3 35/36 15 - - 2 - 50.60 85.00 0.69 Red M - 4 - N/S Scores
8 Lorraine Shumaker Ann Hunter 3 - 17 - - - - 48.51 81.50 M - 8 - N/S Scores
10 Barbara Thomson Dana Conn 3 - - - - - - 46.13 77.50 Q - 4 - N/S Scores
3 Don Schwikert Pamela Schwikert 7 - - - - - - 42.26 71.00 M - 3 - N/S Scores
9 Naomi Lake Anne Berkenkamp 7 - - - - - - 41.96 70.50 M - 9 - N/S Scores
2 Freddie Baldwin Jewel Baldwin 3 - - - - - - 41.07 69.00 M - 2 - N/S Scores

Board Results

Section M

Dlr: N Vul: None
1
13 10 4 13
Q 4 A K 9 8 7 3 J 9 K 6 5
K J 10 7 3 Q J 6 5 K 10 5 2
9 8 6 5 2 2 A 8 6 9 8 7 2

A 10 4 Q 7 4 3 A Q J 10 4 3
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 4N; NS 3; NS 5; EW 4;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-50 4.564 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
-50 4.564 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
-100 1.521 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
-50 4.564 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
-50 4.564 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
-100 1.521 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
-500 00 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
450 7100 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
50 2.536 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
50 2.536 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
100 5.579 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
50 2.536 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
500 7100 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
100 5.579 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
-450 00 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
50 2.536 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop

Dlr: E Vul: N-S
2
11 5 16 8
A 5 K J 4 3 K 10 5 3 2 7 2
J 10 9 8 2 7 Q 6 4 Q 10 8 3
Q 4 3 A Q 8 6 A 9 8 A 6 5

K 7 6 10 9 5 2 J 7 K J 9 4
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2; NS 1; EW 1N; EW 2; E 1; W 2

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-110 457 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
-110 457 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
-140 114 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
-110 457 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
50 6.593 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
-140 114 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
-140 114 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
50 6.593 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
110 343 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
-50 0.57 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
140 686 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
110 343 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
140 686 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
140 686 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
-50 0.57 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
110 343 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop

Dlr: S Vul: E-W
3
5 14 8 13
7 6 5 3 2 Q 6 5 4 2 K 6 7
A J 10 9 K J J 7 3 K J 8 3
Q 8 4 8 7 Q 10 8 4 2 A 6 2

K A 10 9 3 A 9 5 Q 10 9 5 4
Deep Finesse Analysis:
N 3; S 4; EW 2N; EW 2; EW 3; EW 1

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
140 4.564 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
140 4.564 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
170 7100 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
140 4.564 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
140 4.564 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
-90 00 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
100 229 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
90 114 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-140 2.536 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
-140 2.536 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
90 7100 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
-140 2.536 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
-100 571 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
-170 00 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
-90 686 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
-140 2.536 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop

Dlr: W Vul: Both
4
11 7 10 12
A 9 8 2 A 9 K 4 3 2 10 9 2
6 5 3 K 10 7 5 3 2 J 7 K 6
Q 10 7 4 6 Q 9 8 A Q 8 5 4

K J Q J 8 4 A 10 6 5 J 7 3
Deep Finesse Analysis:
N 1N; NS 1; NS 1; NS 3; S 2N;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
110 229 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
150 457 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
200 5.579 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
300 7100 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
110 229 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
110 229 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
100 00 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
200 5.579 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-110 571 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
-150 343 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
-110 571 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
-100 7100 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
-200 1.521 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
-200 1.521 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
-300 00 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
-110 571 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard

Dlr: N Vul: N-S
5
7 6 14 13
K Q J 10 9 8 5 J 9 10 4 9 5
7 2 K 10 7 6 J 3 2 Q 10 7 4
6 3 A Q 8 3 A K 9 6 5 J 6

A 4 5 4 2 Q 8 7 A K 8 3 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1N; NS 3; EW 2; EW 2; EW 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
500 457 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
140 1.521 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
620 686 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
620 686 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
50 00 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
170 343 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
620 686 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
140 1.521 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-50 7100 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
-140 5.579 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
-170 457 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
-620 114 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
-620 114 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
-140 5.579 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
-620 114 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
-500 343 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard

Dlr: E Vul: E-W
6
15 14 7 4
A Q 9 4 10 7 A J 10 5 K J 6
10 7 A K J 8 Q 4 A 10 9 8 5
K 6 3 Q 9 6 3 7 Q 7 4 3 2

J 8 5 2 5 4 2 K 9 8 6 3 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1N; NS 3; NS 4; E 3; EW 4; W 2

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-50 457 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
130 5.579 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
-170 0.57 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
130 5.579 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
-100 343 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
170 7100 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
-150 229 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
-170 0.57 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
100 457 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
-130 1.521 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
-170 00 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
150 571 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
170 6.593 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
170 6.593 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
-130 1.521 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
50 343 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard

Dlr: S Vul: Both
7
18 4 9 9
A 5 4 2 A Q 3 A 6 3 A 9 8
K 9 8 5 10 9 7 5 J 10 5 4 2
Q 10 9 3 J 4 Q J 4 2 K 6 3

K J 8 7 6 10 7 6 2 K 8 Q 7
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 3N; NS 4; NS 3; N 2; NS 1; S 1

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
650 7100 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
620 571 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
-100 1.521 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
-100 1.521 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
620 571 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
-100 1.521 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
-100 1.521 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
620 571 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-620 229 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
100 5.579 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
100 5.579 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
100 5.579 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
-620 229 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
100 5.579 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
-650 00 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
-620 229 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth

Dlr: W Vul: None
8
16 8 7 9
Q 10 9 10 9 8 A K Q J 3 K J
K 5 4 2 J 6 3 2 9 4 A 5 2
A J 8 7 6 Q 4 10 8 7 6 2 10

3 A K 7 5 5 Q 9 8 7 6 4 3
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1N; NS 2; NS 1; NS 4; EW 2;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-150 0.57 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
400 686 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
400 686 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
-50 3.550 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
400 686 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
-100 229 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
-150 0.57 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
-50 3.550 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-400 114 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
100 571 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
-400 114 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
150 6.593 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
50 3.550 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
50 3.550 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
150 6.593 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
-400 114 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth

Dlr: N Vul: E-W
9
7 5 11 17
9 4 2 A 10 5 2 K 4 8 7 4 2
8 5 9 10 8 7 5 3 A J 9 6 5
Q J 10 6 3 Q 8 7 A 9 6 2 Q

A K 7 K J 6 4 3 Q J K 10 3
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2N; NS 3; EW 1; EW 3;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-100 00 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
-50 1.521 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
110 343 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
150 7100 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
140 5.579 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
140 5.579 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
120 457 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
-50 1.521 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
50 5.579 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
-140 1.521 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
-110 457 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
-120 343 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
50 5.579 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
-150 00 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
100 7100 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
-140 1.521 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth

Dlr: E Vul: Both
10
5 13 5 17
Q 6 4 9 7 5 Q J 9 10 8 5 4
8 5 J 6 A 8 7 5 3 2 A K J
J 9 7 3 2 Q 10 2 4 Q 6 3 2

A K 10 A K 8 4 3 K 10 6 9 7
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2N; NS 1; EW 1; EW 1; EW 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-300 00 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
-100 1.521 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
100 3.550 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
140 5.579 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
200 7100 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
-100 1.521 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
100 3.550 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
140 5.579 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
100 5.579 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
-100 3.550 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
-100 3.550 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
-140 1.521 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
-140 1.521 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
300 7100 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
-200 00 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
100 5.579 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein

Dlr: S Vul: None
11
3 12 6 19
9 7 4 9 8 4 K 10 8 4 6 5 4
K 6 3 2 10 Q 9 5 3 A Q J 7
10 5 Q J 7 5 3 2 7 2 K 8 3

A Q J 8 A K 6 A J 6 10 9 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2N; NS 2; NS 2; S 1; EW 2;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
100 4.564 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
120 7100 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
100 4.564 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
100 4.564 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
-50 0.57 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
70 229 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
100 4.564 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
-50 0.57 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-70 571 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
-100 2.536 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
-100 2.536 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
-100 2.536 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
50 6.593 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
-100 2.536 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
50 6.593 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
-120 00 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein

Dlr: W Vul: N-S
12
12 10 13 5
Q J 10 9 8 J 6 A K J 7 5 4
A 9 6 5 2 A Q 7 8 2 6 3 2
J 10 7 K 6 4 A K 5 4 3 Q 9

K 8 4 3 5 3 2 Q 10 9 7 10 8
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1N; NS 1; EW 3; EW 1; EW 2;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-200 114 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
-420 00 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
-140 343 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
-110 4.564 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
-110 4.564 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
-170 229 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
50 686 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
90 7100 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
170 571 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
140 457 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
-50 114 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
110 2.536 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
-90 00 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
200 686 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
110 2.536 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
420 7100 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein

Dlr: N Vul: Both
13
5 17 4 14
9 7 A J 9 4 2 8 2 10 8 4 3
A Q J 5 2 5 3 K 9 6 A K 5
8 6 4 3 Q 10 8 J 10 7 3 J 7

K 10 K 7 6 A Q 5 4 Q 9 6 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1; N 1; S 2; EW 2N; EW 4; EW 2

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-200 2.536 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
-120 571 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
-620 0.57 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
-100 686 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
-200 2.536 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
-620 0.57 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
-140 457 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
100 7100 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
620 6.593 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
140 343 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
100 114 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
-100 00 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
200 4.564 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
200 4.564 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
120 229 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
620 6.593 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck

Dlr: E Vul: None
14
13 15 4 8
A K J 10 6 2 A J 10 7 6 4 6
Q 8 A Q J 8 3 A Q 10 9 5 3
9 5 4 9 5 2 10 7 4 K J 8 2

Q 8 7 3 K 3 K 9 6 5 2 7 4
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 6; N 4; S 5; EW 1; EW 4;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
230 114 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
510 686 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
480 3.550 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
480 3.550 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
480 3.550 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
480 3.550 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
690 7100 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
-400 00 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-480 3.550 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
-690 00 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
-480 3.550 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
400 7100 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
-480 3.550 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
-230 686 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
-510 114 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
-480 3.550 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck

Dlr: S Vul: N-S
15
6 10 17 7
K 10 8 2 K 6 3 2 8 10 6 5 3
9 7 6 3 A 7 9 5 4 A Q 9 2
A J Q 10 8 5 4 A Q J 10 K 7

Q 5 4 J 9 K 7 6 3 2 J 8 4
Deep Finesse Analysis:
EW 3N; EW 2; EW 4; EW 3; E 3; W 2

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-430 1.521 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
100 7100 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
-460 00 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
50 5.579 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
50 5.579 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
-400 3.550 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
-430 1.521 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
-400 3.550 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
460 7100 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
430 5.579 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
-50 1.521 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
400 3.550 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
-50 1.521 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
430 5.579 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
-100 00 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
400 3.550 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck

Dlr: W Vul: E-W
16
5 17 7 11
8 6 4 A J 5 4 3 4 2 8 7 4
5 9 A K Q J 10 9 8 7 3 A K
A 9 7 3 K 10 7 6 5 10 5 3 2

K Q J 10 2 Q 8 2 6 Q J 9 6
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1; NS 1; NS 1; EW 6N; EW 6;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-1370 2.536 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
-620 6.593 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
-1370 2.536 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
-1370 2.536 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
-1370 2.536 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
-620 6.593 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
-1370 2.536 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
-1370 2.536 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
1370 4.564 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
1370 4.564 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
1370 4.564 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
1370 4.564 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
1370 4.564 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
620 0.57 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
620 0.57 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
1370 4.564 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren

Dlr: N Vul: None
17
14 7 15 4
9 8 3 Q 10 5 3 2 A A K J 8
A Q 7 2 J 4 9 5 4 10 9 7 2
6 5 A K 8 6 K Q J 10 3 Q 5

K J 10 4 9 7 8 7 6 2 6 4 3
Deep Finesse Analysis:
EW 2N; EW 1; EW 1; EW 3; EW 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-110 229 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
-110 229 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
50 686 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
100 7100 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
-90 571 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
-110 229 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
-110 229 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
-110 229 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
110 571 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
-100 00 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
110 571 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
90 229 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
110 571 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
110 571 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
110 571 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
-50 114 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren

Dlr: E Vul: N-S
18
19 10 3 8
A K 10 9 K Q 8 A 9 7 K 7 3
8 6 J 10 9 5 3 2 K 8 A Q 9
Q 7 5 4 3 2 10 6 2 J 8 6 5

J A 7 6 4 Q J 5 4 3 10 4 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 4N; NS 1; NS 3; N 5; NS 2; S 4

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
100 0.57 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
660 7100 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
630 571 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
630 571 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
240 343 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
210 229 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
630 571 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
100 0.57 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-630 229 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
-630 229 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
-100 6.593 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
-240 457 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
-100 6.593 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
-210 571 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
-660 00 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
-630 229 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren

Dlr: S Vul: E-W
19
13 7 13 7
9 7 6 A K 9 6 K 10 6 K 9 6
K J 3 Q 3 J 9 7 5 4 5 3 2
A Q 8 4 2 J 10 7 5 4 Q 2 A

10 5 8 2 A 8 3 Q J 10 8 7 4
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1N; NS 3; EW 3; EW 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
110 571 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
-140 1.521 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
-140 1.521 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
-140 1.521 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
110 571 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
130 7100 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
110 571 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
-140 1.521 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
140 5.579 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
140 5.579 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
-110 229 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
-110 229 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
-130 00 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
140 5.579 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
-110 229 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
140 5.579 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren

Dlr: W Vul: Both
20
9 11 8 12
K 4 7 K Q J 10 6 4 9 8 4 3
A Q J 6 3 J 5 4 8 3 2 K 6
5 2 A K 9 3 2 5 J 10 7 5 2

10 9 8 7 Q 10 8 6 A 9 7 A Q
Deep Finesse Analysis:
N 1N; NS 3; S 2N; EW 2; EW 3; EW 1

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
130 3.550 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
200 5.579 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
-100 00 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
110 229 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
100 114 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
300 7100 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
200 5.579 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
130 3.550 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-110 571 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
-130 3.550 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
-100 686 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
-130 3.550 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
-300 00 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
-200 1.521 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
-200 1.521 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
100 7100 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren

Dlr: N Vul: N-S
21
8 8 16 8
6 4 K 7 6 2 K Q 9 8 6 4 4
A 10 A 8 5 10 7 5 2 10 9 5 2
K J 8 7 5 9 A J 3 A K 8 7

Q 9 3 2 Q J 10 4 3 Q J 6 3
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1; EW 2N; EW 3; EW 2; EW 4;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-200 00 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
-110 229 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
-110 229 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
100 7100 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
-100 4.564 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
50 686 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
-110 229 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
-100 4.564 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-100 00 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
100 2.536 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron
100 2.536 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
200 7100 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
-50 114 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
110 571 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
110 571 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
110 571 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren

Dlr: E Vul: E-W
22
12 11 9 8
Q 9 8 5 10 A Q 8 7 3 A 10 6
A J 10 4 7 2 K J 4 Q 9 4 2
7 3 2 K Q 9 3 6 K J 7 5 3

K 6 A J 8 6 5 4 10 9 5 2 8
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1; NS 3; NS 5; EW 2;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-120 00 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
-110 114 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
130 686 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
-50 343 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
400 7100 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
110 571 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
-50 343 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
-50 343 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-400 00 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
120 7100 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
-110 229 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
110 686 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
50 457 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
-130 114 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
50 457 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
50 457 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino

Dlr: S Vul: Both
23
16 4 13 7
K 3 A J 10 A J 4 K 7 6 4 2
A 7 5 9 8 6 5 3 2 6 2 5 3
Q 10 9 8 6 K 7 K 8 7 A J 9

J 4 2 Q 4 Q 10 9 5 3 Q 10 8
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1N; NS 3; NS 3; EW 1; EW 2;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-100 4.564 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
-300 0.57 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
-140 343 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
150 7100 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
-100 4.564 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
90 686 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
-200 229 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
-300 0.57 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
100 2.536 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
100 2.536 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
-90 114 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
300 6.593 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
200 571 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
140 457 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
300 6.593 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
-150 00 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino

Dlr: W Vul: None
24
12 8 10 10
Q 8 5 4 10 2 A 9 2 A Q 7 3
J 10 7 6 A K 7 5 3 6 3 6 2
3 Q 6 K J 8 5 4 K J 10 5 4

A K 9 2 J 9 8 4 Q 10 7 9 8
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1N; N 2; S 1; EW 1; EW 1; EW 1

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
150 7100 1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
-50 229 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
50 457 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
110 5.579 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn
110 5.579 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
-100 00 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
-50 229 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
-50 229 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-110 1.521 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
-150 00 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
1-John Barnard-Charlotte Barnard
100 7100 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
50 571 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
50 571 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
-50 343 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
50 571 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
-110 1.521 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino

Dlr: N Vul: E-W
25
12 16 4 8
K 9 8 7 6 3 A K 9 2 2 Q 8
A J 10 6 K Q J 7 A J 10 7 6
10 4 2 J 7 4 3 5 4 3 K 9 4

Q 5 Q 8 5 A 10 9 8 6 5 3 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 3; NS 1; EW 2N; EW 1; EW 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
110 457 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
100 229 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
110 457 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
-100 00 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
140 6.593 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
-50 114 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
110 457 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
140 6.593 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
100 7100 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
-140 0.57 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
-110 343 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
50 686 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
-100 571 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
-110 343 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
-110 343 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
-140 0.57 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford

Dlr: E Vul: Both
26
12 4 12 12
K Q 3 2 A K 8 7 8 7 6 3 2
10 6 3 10 9 5 4 A 10 9 8 6 4
A 9 8 7 5 5 4 2 A K J 3 2

J 6 4 Q J 10 9 K Q J Q 7 5
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1; NS 1; NS 3; EW 2N; EW 5;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-200 00 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
110 343 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
170 686 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
-130 229 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
140 4.564 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
-150 114 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
300 7100 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
140 4.564 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
130 571 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
-140 2.536 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
200 7100 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
150 686 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
-110 457 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
-300 00 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
-170 114 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
-140 2.536 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford

Dlr: S Vul: None
27
6 9 8 17
Q 10 9 8 3 A 8 4 10 3 10 7 2
J 5 Q J 10 7 2 K J 2 J 9 3
A 7 2 9 5 3 Q 7 6 4 Q 6 4

K 6 4 K 6 A 9 8 5 A K 8 5
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 3N; NS 4; NS 2; NS 3;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
170 457 2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
170 457 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
170 457 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
170 457 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish
170 457 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert
170 457 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
140 00 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
170 457 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-170 343 1-Lorne Ginn-Linda Wish vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
-170 343 3-Don Schwikert-Pamela Schwikert vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
-170 343 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
2-John Schoeberlein-Julie Schoeberlein
-170 343 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
-170 343 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
-140 7100 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
-170 343 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
-170 343 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford

Dlr: W Vul: N-S
28
12 5 7 16
9 4 J 6 4 2 A 9 6 A K 10 8
J 6 2 K 10 8 3 J 10 7 5 2 6
Q 8 7 3 Q 9 7 5 K 3 7 4 2

A K 10 5 A Q 8 4 Q J 9 5 3
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 3N; NS 3; NS 1; NS 2; NS 6;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
600 457 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
630 6.593 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
130 0.57 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
600 457 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
150 229 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
130 0.57 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
630 6.593 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
600 457 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-600 343 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
-150 571 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
-600 343 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
-130 6.593 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
-630 0.57 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
-630 0.57 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
-130 6.593 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
-600 343 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron

Dlr: N Vul: Both
29
10 11 10 9
K 10 K 10 7 7 6 4 A 8 5 4 3
Q J 7 5 3 A 6 5 4 Q 5 Q 7
8 J 9 A K J 10 9 3 2 J 10 9

A 9 6 4 2 Q 8 3 2 8 K 6 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 3; NS 2; NS 3; EW 2N; EW 3;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-130 1.521 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
-110 457 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
-130 1.521 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
100 686 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
-110 457 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
200 7100 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
-110 457 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
-630 00 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-100 114 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
110 343 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
130 5.579 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
-200 00 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
110 343 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
110 343 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
130 5.579 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
630 7100 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron

Dlr: E Vul: None
30
2 9 14 15
9 5 8 6 Q 9 6 5 2 9 8 5 4
8 6 2 A K Q 7 5 4 8 3 7 2
A K Q J 10 7 J 9 2 K 7 6 3

4 3 10 3 A J 10 4 A K Q J 10
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2; NS 2; E 1N; E 4; E 4; W 3;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
-450 00 3-James Warren-Ruth Warren vs.
5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens
-420 229 4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino vs.
7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes
50 6.593 5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger vs.
9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp
-200 4.564 6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop vs.
2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin
-420 229 7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth vs.
4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne
-200 4.564 8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck vs.
6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson
50 6.593 9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford vs.
8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter
-420 229 10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron vs.
10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
200 2.536 2-Freddie Baldwin-Jewel Baldwin vs.
6-Vaishali Jategaonkar-Helen Waldrop
420 571 4-Arthur Fleming-Robert Van Duyne vs.
7-Hank Lavender-Diane Woodworth
450 7100 5-Michael Harvey-Sarah Stevens vs.
3-James Warren-Ruth Warren
200 2.536 6-Katherine Baer-Beth Watson vs.
8-Patricia McFeely-Susan Ingelbinck
420 571 7-Louise Ragland-Kay Hughes vs.
4-James Marino-Kathleen Marino
-50 0.57 8-Lorraine Shumaker-Ann Hunter vs.
9-Dianne Hale-Kay Crawford
-50 0.57 9-Naomi Lake-Anne Berkenkamp vs.
5-Jacqueline Doyle-Mary Bollinger
420 571 10-Barbara Thomson-Dana Conn vs.
10-Martha Buell-Peggy Barron