Jul 07, 2016 - Thursday 7:30 pm

Evening Side Game ( Fast Pairs ) Event Summary

Session

5.0 Tables

Players

Overalls

 

mps Color A B C Overall Score % Player 1 Player 2 Personal
Scores
2.84 Gold|Red 1 58.00 58.00 Craig HemphillJacksonville, FL Betty SandiferDaytona Beach, FL Scores
2.13 Gold|Red 2 56.50 56.50 Teri SmootPlacerville, CA Mary OseSacramento, CA Scores
2.46 Red 3 1 1 56.00 56.00 Mark FranzoniJacksonville Bc, FL Lynn ChapmanJacksonville, FL Scores
1.20 Red 4 53.50 53.50 Diane GraeseLas Vegas, NV Junko HemusWindermere, FL Scores
1.85 Red 2 2 52.50 52.50 Joyce AkridgeOcala, FL Mike AkridgeOcala, FL Scores

Recaps

Section R

NS

Pair Player 1 Player 2 Flt Qual Overall Section Session
Score
% Carry
Over
Adjust Overall
Score
mps Color Next
Session
Personal
Scores
A B C A B C
5 Teri Smoot Mary Ose A 2 - - 1 - - 56.50 56.50 2.13 Gold|Red Scores
1 Joyce Akridge Mike Akridge C - 2 2 2/3 1 1 52.50 52.50 1.85 Red Scores
3 Bruce Bedient Kim Martin A - - - 2/3 - - 52.50 52.50 1.06 Red Scores
2 Virginia Jones Ruth Williams C - - - - - - 48.00 48.00 Scores
4 Connie Graunke Mike Neff C - - - - - - 40.50 40.50 Scores

EW

Pair Player 1 Player 2 Flt Qual Overall Section Session
Score
% Carry
Over
Adjust Overall
Score
mps Color Next
Session
Personal
Scores
A B C A B C
3 Craig Hemphill Betty Sandifer A 1 - - 1 - - 58.00 58.00 2.84 Gold|Red Scores
5 Mark Franzoni Lynn Chapman C 3 1 1 2 1 1 56.00 56.00 2.46 Red Scores
2 Diane Graese Junko Hemus A 4 - - - - - 53.50 53.50 1.20 Red Scores
1 Janice Boekenheide Ann Hanley C - - - - - - 44.00 44.00 Scores
4 Joann Vergnolle Jane Gregory C - - - - - - 38.50 38.50 Scores

Board Results

Section R

Dlr: N Vul: None
1
9 11 8 12
8 7 6 K Q 4 3 10 8 5 A 8 5
K 5 7 K 9 6 2 K Q 10 9 7 4
J 4 A 8 6 5 2 Q 7 4 J 3 2

A Q 10 9 3 2 J 10 9 A J 3 6
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 4; NS 1; EW 1; EW 3;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 S 140 1.538 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
3 S 170 375 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
5x W 300 4100 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
3 W -110 00 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
2 S 140 1.538 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 S -140 2.562 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
3 W 110 4100 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
3 S -170 125 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
2 S -140 2.562 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
5x W -300 00 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin

Dlr: E Vul: N-S
2
1 8 20 11
9 8 2 6 3 2 J 7 5 2 10 8 5
J 7 6 4 K Q J 5 9 4 3 J 6
10 3 A 10 8 7 A K 6 A K Q 9

A K Q 5 9 4 Q 10 8 7 4 3 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
EW 4N; EW 3; EW 5; EW 2; EW 4;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 E -450 1.538 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
4 E -450 1.538 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
4 E -450 1.538 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
4 E -450 1.538 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
2 E -200 4100 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 E 450 2.562 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
4 E 450 2.562 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
4 E 450 2.562 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
2 E 200 00 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
4 E 450 2.562 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin

Dlr: S Vul: E-W
3
9 11 13 7
5 9 5 4 2 A J 9 8 5 A 10 3
Q J 10 3 K 8 Q 10 6 3 K 4 2
A 9 4 2 A 3 K 7 Q 9 8 7 6

K 8 7 6 Q J 10 7 6 4 2 J 5
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2; EW 3; EW 1; EW 3;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 W -140 2.563 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
3 E -140 2.563 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
2 W -170 0.513 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
3 W -170 0.513 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
3 S 140 4100 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 W 140 1.537 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
3 W 170 3.587 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
3 E 140 1.537 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
3 S -140 00 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
2 W 170 3.587 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin

Dlr: W Vul: Both
4
14 11 5 10
K J 10 7 6 K Q 2 K Q 5 10 6
10 9 8 6 J 6 4 A K Q J 8 4
9 8 4 3 A J 7 5 8 7 9 5 3

A Q 5 2 4 3 A 10 9 3 2 7 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 4; N 2; S 3; EW 4; EW 4;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2 N 170 1.538 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
4 N 620 3.588 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
2 N 170 1.538 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
5 W 100 00 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
4 N 620 3.588 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2 N -170 2.562 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
5 W -100 4100 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
4 N -620 0.512 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
4 N -620 0.512 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
2 N -170 2.562 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin

Dlr: N Vul: N-S
5
13 4 13 10
A K 8 5 3 J 6 5 J 6 2 A 4
9 4 2 9 7 4 2 7 4 K J 6 2
Q 7 K Q 10 8 3 A Q 9 5 9 8

J 10 6 A K 10 8 3 Q 10 7 5 3
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2N; NS 4; NS 3; NS 3; EW 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 N 620 3.588 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
3 N -100 0.513 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
4 N 620 3.588 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
4 N -100 0.513 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
2 N 140 250 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 N -620 0.512 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
4 N 100 3.587 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
3 N 100 3.587 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
2 N -140 250 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
4 N -620 0.512 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin

Dlr: E Vul: E-W
6
9 6 16 9
9 4 3 2 K J 10 9 A J 10 6 5
6 Q 6 4 10 8 4 3 2 A 8 4 2
A K J 10 8 A 2 K 6 J 9 7 3

Q 7 5 8 7 5 3 Q 9 7 5 K Q
Deep Finesse Analysis:
EW 1N; E 2; E 2; E 4; W 3; W 1; W 3; W 5;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
1 E -140 00 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
2 E -110 1.538 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
2 E -110 1.538 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
1NT E -90 4100 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
2 S -100 375 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
1NT E 90 00 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
2 E 110 2.562 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
2 S 100 125 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
2 E 110 2.562 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
1 E 140 4100 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge

Dlr: S Vul: Both
7
11 7 7 15
K 9 8 7 4 8 2 K 10 4 K Q 3
A 10 6 K 10 9 5 6 5 3 2 8 4
J Q J 7 6 4 Q 8 J 9 6 5 2

Q 5 3 2 A 3 A J 9 7 A 10 7
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2N; NS 5; NS 5; NS 2; EW 2;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 N 650 250 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
4 S 680 4100 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
4 S 620 00 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
4 S 650 250 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
4 S 650 250 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 S -650 250 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
4 S -680 00 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
4 S -650 250 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
4 S -620 4100 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
4 N -650 250 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge

Dlr: W Vul: None
8
11 11 10 8
9 8 7 2 A Q 8 3 8 K Q 9 8
A K J 5 4 3 Q J 7 5 10 5 4
Q J 10 6 5 4 A K 10 6 7 6 3

10 6 K 9 7 2 9 4 3 2 A J 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2; NS 1; EW 3; EW 3;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 W -140 3.588 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
2 W -170 250 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
2 W -140 3.588 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
4 W -420 0.513 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
4 W -420 0.513 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 W 420 3.587 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
2 W 170 250 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
4 W 420 3.587 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
2 W 140 0.512 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
3 W 140 0.512 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge

Dlr: N Vul: E-W
9
8 13 10 9
Q 8 3 9 7 A Q 9 8 7 6 9 8
J 7 6 K 5 K J 5 4 K Q 6 5
9 5 A Q 8 6 3 10 3 A 10 3 2

A K 10 4 2 J 10 4 2 2 J 7 4
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2; NS 1; EW 2; EW 2;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 E 100 250 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
3 S 140 4100 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
2 N 110 375 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
2 S -50 0.513 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
2 N -50 0.513 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2 S 50 3.587 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
3 S -140 00 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
2 N 50 3.587 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
2 N -110 125 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
3 E -100 250 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge

Dlr: E Vul: Both
10
9 8 14 9
J 9 3 K J 10 7 6 2 A 8 7 3
K 10 7 4 2 J 6 4 2 A 5 4 9
A 8 5 3 A Q 10 9 7 5 Q Q 10

Q 6 K 8 9 8 3 K J 6 5 4 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2; NS 1; EW 1N; EW 5; EW 5;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 E -650 1.538 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
4 E -650 1.538 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
4 E -650 1.538 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
2 E -200 4100 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
4 E -650 1.538 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2 E 200 00 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
4 E 650 2.562 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
4 E 650 2.562 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
4 E 650 2.562 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
4 E 650 2.562 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge

Dlr: S Vul: None
11
8 4 9 19
J 8 6 5 4 7 3 K 8 5 A 8 5
10 2 J 8 4 2 Q 6 2 J 10 9 2
K Q 3 A 10 9 6 5 10 9 7 6 4

A 9 7 K Q A J 4 3 K Q 7 3
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2N; NS 4; NS 1; NS 4; NS 3;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3NT S 400 375 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
3NT S -150 00 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
4 N -50 250 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
3NT S -100 125 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
4 N 420 4100 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3NT S 150 4100 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
4 N -420 00 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
4 N 50 250 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
3NT S -400 125 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
3NT S 100 375 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff

Dlr: W Vul: N-S
12
12 12 6 10
Q J 8 5 2 Q J 4 A Q 5 4 3
A 10 6 K 10 9 6 5 K Q 9 2 9
K 4 7 3 2 10 8 7 6 4 K 10 7

9 7 3 A 8 J 5 3 A J 8 6 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 3; NS 3; EW 2; E 3; W 2;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
1 N 170 4100 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
3 W 100 125 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
3 S 110 250 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
3 N -100 00 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
3 N 140 375 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 W -100 375 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
3 N -140 125 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
3 S -110 250 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
1 N -170 00 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
3 N 100 4100 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff

Dlr: N Vul: Both
13
9 6 17 8
A 10 J 4 2 Q 8 5 3 2 Q 7 6
Q 4 3 10 9 6 5 6 A 10 9 8 3
9 6 2 A K Q 8 7 A K J 4 5

K J 8 7 5 3 10 9 7 K J 4 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
EW 3N; EW 4; EW 1; EW 1; W 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2 E -170 3.588 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
3 E -170 3.588 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
4 E -650 0.513 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
4 E -620 250 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
4 E -650 0.513 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 E 170 0.512 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
4 E 650 3.587 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
4 E 650 3.587 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
2 E 170 0.512 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
4 E 620 250 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff

Dlr: E Vul: None
14
12 5 10 13
K 6 5 4 K 9 5 4 Q 7 2 A 9
J 10 8 7 3 J 7 K 10 9 5 3 2
A 2 Q 6 3 8 5 3 K J 10 8 6

Q 9 A 10 8 2 A J 6 4 Q 7 4
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2N; NS 2; N 4; NS 3; NS 2; S 3;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 S -100 0.513 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
3NT N -100 0.513 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
4 N -50 250 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
4 N 420 3.588 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
4 N 420 3.588 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3NT N 100 3.587 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
4 N -420 0.512 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
4 N 50 250 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
4 S 100 3.587 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
4 N -420 0.512 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff

Dlr: S Vul: N-S
15
14 8 7 11
J 9 A K K 8 4 K 9 8 7 3 2
A 7 6 3 10 6 5 4 2 A 5 3 6
K 10 5 2 9 8 7 3 Q J 10 2 J

Q 8 4 Q J 9 7 6 A Q 10 5 4
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 3N; NS 3; EW 2; EW 2; EW 2;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 N 130 375 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
5 N -100 125 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
3NT N 600 4100 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
4 N -100 125 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
4 N -100 125 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
5 N 100 375 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
4 N 100 375 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
3NT N -600 00 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
3 N -130 125 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
4 N 100 375 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff

Dlr: W Vul: E-W
16
4 14 10 12
10 6 2 J 7 4 3 K 9 6 3 9 6
A K Q 10 6 2 J 10 8 5 A 10 8
J 7 4 3 A K 9 7 2 Q 7 4 3

Q 9 8 5 8 5 A Q 4 K J 5 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
EW 2N; EW 1; E 3; E 2; EW 3; W 2; W 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3NT W -600 00 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
1NT W -150 125 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
1NT W -90 3.588 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
1NT W -120 250 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
1NT W -90 3.588 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
1NT W 90 0.512 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
1NT W 90 0.512 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
3NT W 600 4100 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
1NT W 120 250 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
1NT W 150 375 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams

Dlr: N Vul: None
17
3 6 14 17
9 8 6 J 6 10 9 7 3 Q 6 5 2
10 2 8 5 4 3 K 5 2 K 8 7 3
A Q J 4 3 A 9 7 2 Q J 10 4

K 7 5 K Q 10 A 8 6 4 A J 9
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1; NS 1; EW 1N; EW 2; EW 2;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
1NT N -100 1.538 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
2 E -170 00 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
1NT S -100 1.538 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
1NT S -50 3.588 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
1NT S -50 3.588 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
1NT S 50 0.512 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
1NT S 100 2.562 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
1NT N 100 2.562 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
1NT S 50 0.512 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
2 E 170 4100 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams

Dlr: E Vul: N-S
18
18 4 15 3
J 6 4 A 10 5 A K Q 10 8 3 A
9 8 3 K J 9 4 7 10 9 7 4 2
A K 7 Q 7 6 6 2 K Q J 6 3

Q 10 5 2 8 3 2 J 9 5 4 8 5
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2N; NS 2; NS 3; EW 1; EW 3;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2 N 130 3.588 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
3 N 130 3.588 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
3NT N -100 00 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
4 E 50 125 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
3 S 110 250 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 S -110 250 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
3NT N 100 4100 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
2 N -130 0.512 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
4 E -50 375 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
3 N -130 0.512 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams

Dlr: S Vul: E-W
19
9 5 9 17
J 7 Q 9 8 6 K Q J 6 6 4 3
K Q 8 6 3 10 10 9 3 10 8 7 2
9 K J 4 3 2 A 8 4 2 J 9 5

A 10 5 4 2 A 7 5 7 5 A K Q
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 3N; NS 2; NS 3; NS 2; NS 2;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3NT N -50 125 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
2NT N 150 375 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
3 S -50 125 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
3NT S 400 4100 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
3 S -50 125 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 S 50 375 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
3 S 50 375 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
3NT N 50 375 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
3NT S -400 00 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
2NT N -150 125 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams

Dlr: W Vul: Both
20
9 13 15 3
Q 3 J 8 4 3 2 K Q 10 9 2 J
K J 8 4 2 K 6 A Q 10 9 7 6
A 10 9 7 6 5 A 8 5 3 A K 3

Q 10 9 7 5 J 7 6 4 8 5 4 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 3; NS 2; EW 7N; EW 7; E 7; W 6;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
6 W -1460 125 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
6 W -1460 125 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman
6 W -1460 125 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
4 W -710 375 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
5x S -500 4100 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
5x S 500 00 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose
6 W 1460 375 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
6 W 1460 375 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
4 W 710 125 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
6 W 1460 375 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams

Dlr: N Vul: N-S
21
6 12 4 18
8 7 6 9 8 6 2 J 3 K Q 8 4
Q J 2 A J 4 3 10 6 4 A 5 3
A 10 9 5 7 5 8 7 5 2 9 7 2

K 4 3 K Q 10 A K Q 9 J 10 6
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2N; NS 1; NS 3; NS 2; NS 3;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2NT S 180 375 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
1NT S 150 250 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
3NT S 630 4100 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
2NT S 120 125 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
3NT N -100 00 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3NT S -630 00 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
2NT S -180 125 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
2NT S -120 375 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
1NT S -150 250 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
3NT N 100 4100 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose

Dlr: E Vul: E-W
22
9 5 11 15
K J 6 4 3 8 7 4 Q J 4 Q 3
5 J 10 6 3 2 9 7 A 10 8 4 2
10 9 8 A K 9 6 5 3 K J 9 5

A Q 7 2 Q 5 A K 10 8 2 7 6
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 3; NS 3; EW 4; EW 4;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 N 450 2.563 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
4 N 450 2.563 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
4 N 450 2.563 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
4 S 450 2.563 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
3 S 140 00 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 N -450 1.537 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
4 N -450 1.537 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
4 S -450 1.537 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
4 N -450 1.537 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
3 S -140 4100 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose

Dlr: S Vul: Both
23
5 12 7 16
K J 7 2 J 8 5 3 9 8 4 7 6
Q 9 6 10 9 4 A K Q J 7 3 2
A 8 4 7 2 10 6 3 2 Q J 9 5

10 5 3 A K Q 6 5 A K 10 8 4
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1N; NS 3; NS 4; NS 3; E 2; W 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 W 100 125 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
2 S 110 250 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
1 S 140 375 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
1NT E -90 00 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
4 S 650 4100 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
1 S -140 125 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
3 W -100 375 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
1NT E 90 4100 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
2 S -110 250 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
4 S -650 00 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose

Dlr: W Vul: None
24
10 11 5 14
A Q 10 9 8 8 7 8 5 4 A 10 5
J 4 Q 4 2 A K J 10 9 9 8 2
6 5 3 10 9 6 5 3 K Q 6 4 3

K 7 2 A K J 3 Q 7 6 2 J 7
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 3N; NS 3; NS 1; NS 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 N 140 375 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
3 N -50 250 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
4 N -100 125 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
4 N -150 00 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
3x W 500 4100 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 N 100 375 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
3 N -140 125 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
4 N 150 4100 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
3 N 50 250 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
3x W -500 00 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose

Dlr: N Vul: E-W
25
17 9 9 5
K Q 10 9 8 2 A K Q 6 K 9 8
A J 10 8 6 3 K J 10 6 5 4 2
J 7 6 4 3 5 3 A 4 2 A 9 3

5 J 10 9 8 7 4 2 Q 7 5 Q 7
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2; NS 4; EW 5; EW 6;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
5x S -100 2.563 1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge vs.
2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus
4 N -150 125 2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams vs.
4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory
4 S 450 4100 3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin vs.
1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley
5 N -100 2.563 4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff vs.
3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer
4x N -300 00 5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose vs.
5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 S -450 00 1-Janice Boekenheide-Ann Hanley vs.
3-Bruce Bedient-Kim Martin
5x S 100 1.537 2-Diane Graese-Junko Hemus vs.
1-Joyce Akridge-Mike Akridge
5 N 100 1.537 3-Craig Hemphill-Betty Sandifer vs.
4-Connie Graunke-Mike Neff
4 N 150 375 4-Joann Vergnolle-Jane Gregory vs.
2-Virginia Jones-Ruth Williams
4x N 300 4100 5-Mark Franzoni-Lynn Chapman vs.
5-Teri Smoot-Mary Ose