Jul 05, 2016 - Tuesday 10:00 am

Tuesday Morning I/N 299er Pairs Event Summary

Session 1

6.0 Tables

Players

Overalls

 

mps Color A B C Overall Score % Player 1 Player 2 Personal
Scores
2.10 Red 1 1 56.63 56.63 R Douglas SmithJacksonville, FL Catherine BeykovskyJacksonville, FL Scores
1.75 Red 2 2 1 55.13 55.13 Lindley RhodesPonte Vedra, FL Sylvia HollenbeckPonte Vedra, FL Scores
1.31 Red 3 3 2 54.63 54.63 Catherine HollandFernandina, FL Penney BurnettFernandina Bch, FL Scores
0.98 Red 4 4 3 54.00 54.00 Alice FransonSaint Augustine, FL Giles LaurenSaint Augustine, FL Scores
0.74 Red 4 53.38 53.38 Ann RudenAtlantic Beach, FL Jeanne ImhoffJacksonville, FL Scores

Recaps

Section O

NS

Pair Player 1 Player 2 Flt Qual Overall Section Session
Score
% Carry
Over
Adjust Overall
Score
mps Color Next
Session
Personal
Scores
A B C A B C
1 R Douglas Smith Catherine Beykovsky B 1 1 - 1 1 - 56.63 56.63 2.10 Red Scores
5 Lindley Rhodes Sylvia Hollenbeck C 2 2 1 2 2 1 55.13 55.13 1.75 Red Scores
2 Ann Ruden Jeanne Imhoff C - - 4 - - 2 53.38 53.38 0.74 Red Scores
4 Jacqueline Boggs John La Cara B - - - - - - 49.38 49.38 Scores
6 Anne Kohlman Karen Kettunen C - - - - - - 49.00 49.00 Scores
3 Vance Chrystal Mary Ann Lindsey C - - - - - - 35.94 35.94 Scores

EW

Pair Player 1 Player 2 Flt Qual Overall Section Session
Score
% Carry
Over
Adjust Overall
Score
mps Color Next
Session
Personal
Scores
A B C A B C
4 Catherine Holland Penney Burnett C 3 3 2 1 1 1 54.63 54.63 1.31 Red Scores
6 Alice Franson Giles Lauren C 4 4 3 2 2 2 54.00 54.00 0.98 Red Scores
2 Judy Shaffer Carolyn Somerville C - - - - - - 51.38 51.38 Scores
1 Diane Melson Walter Melson C - - - - - - 49.48 49.48 Scores
5 Dana Levitan Robin Leventhal C - - - - - - 49.38 49.38 Scores
3 Pam Bigelow Michael Bigelow B - - - - - - 41.13 41.13 Scores

Board Results

Section O

Dlr: N Vul: None
1
8 9 10 13
Q 10 9 8 6 2 K 6 K 10 7 2 10
J 3 3 9 6 4 A K J 7 6 4 3
K 7 5 Q J 10 5 Q 5 Q 9 5 2

A 4 A 9 8 7 4 2 A J 8 3 8
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 5; NS 3; NS 5; EW 3;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 N 420 3.588 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
4x N -100 00 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
3 N 200 125 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
4 N 420 3.588 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
5x W 300 250 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 N -420 0.512 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
4 N -420 0.512 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck
4x N 100 4100 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
5x W -300 250 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
3 N -200 375 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara

Dlr: E Vul: N-S
2
3 15 6 16
10 3 8 7 5 K 7 5 4 3 7 6 4
K 9 K J 4 3 A J 9 8 Q J 10
A 8 7 4 Q 9 6 10 2 8 5 3 2

Q J 6 5 2 A 10 2 Q 6 A K 9
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1; E 1N; EW 2; EW 1; EW 2; W 2N;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
1NT W -120 00 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
1NT W 50 125 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
2x W 300 375 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
2x S 670 4100 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
1NT S 120 250 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
1NT W 120 4100 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
2x S -670 00 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck
1NT W -50 375 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
1NT S -120 250 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
2x W -300 125 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara

Dlr: S Vul: E-W
3
12 15 7 6
8 6 J 9 7 4 Q 8 3 A K Q 10
A K J 7 K Q 5 J 9 6 4 2 J
4 A 3 2 K 10 7 5 8 6 5 4 2

Q 10 9 5 3 2 10 8 6 A 9 7 3
Deep Finesse Analysis:
EW 2N; EW 1; EW 1; EW 5; EW 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2 S -100 2.563 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
3 W -130 0.513 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
2 S 110 4100 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
3 N -100 2.563 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
1 W -130 0.513 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2 S 100 1.537 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
3 N 100 1.537 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck
3 W 130 3.587 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
1 W 130 3.587 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
2 S -110 00 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara

Dlr: W Vul: Both
4
14 13 5 8
A 8 3 K J 10 7 K Q J 4 9 8
K 10 2 Q 4 A 9 8 2 A 10 7 4
Q 7 6 4 6 7 3 Q J 6 5 3 2

J 9 5 A 9 8 5 3 2 10 6 5 K
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 3; NS 1; EW 2; EW 4;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 S 170 125 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
3 W -150 00 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
4 S 650 4100 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
4 S 620 375 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
2 E 200 250 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 S -170 375 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
4 S -620 125 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck
3 W 150 4100 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
2 E -200 250 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
4 S -650 00 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara

Dlr: N Vul: N-S
5
8 18 6 8
9 5 K 5 4 A 9 7 4 3 J 3 2
K 3 A 10 9 2 K J 5 A K 9 7
Q 10 8 6 4 2 Q 8 Q 8 2 5 4

A J 7 J 7 6 3 10 6 Q 10 8 6
Deep Finesse Analysis:
EW 1N; EW 3; EW 1; EW 1; EW 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2NT W 50 375 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
3NT W -400 00 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
3 W -170 125 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
4 E 50 375 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
4 E 50 375 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2NT W -50 125 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
4 E -50 125 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck
3NT W 400 4100 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
4 E -50 125 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
3 W 170 375 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara

Dlr: E Vul: E-W
6
13 21 4 2
K 9 A J 5 10 9 5 A J 10 8 3
A Q J Q 9 8 4 A K 7 K Q 6
7 6 5 4 2 K 7 6 2 J 9 7 2

10 8 3 10 3 Q 8 6 4 3 2 5 4
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2; E 2; E 2; EW 1; W 2N; W 3; W 3;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4NT W 300 4100 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
2 W 200 250 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
3NT W 100 00 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal
3NT W 200 250 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
2NT W 200 250 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3NT W -200 250 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck
2 W -200 250 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
2NT W -200 250 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
3NT W -100 4100 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
4NT W -300 00 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky

Dlr: S Vul: Both
7
15 5 4 16
8 4 K J 5 Q 7 5 A K Q 8 5
9 A 9 3 2 J 10 6 4 9 6 4 3
J 10 7 3 2 Q 6 9 8 2 J 10 2

A K Q 6 5 10 8 7 4 A K 3 7
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 5N; NS 5; NS 4; NS 4; NS 5;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3NT N 630 125 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
3NT N 690 4100 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
5NT S -100 00 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal
3NT S 660 2.563 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
3NT N 660 2.563 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3NT S -660 1.537 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck
3NT N -690 00 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
3NT N -660 1.537 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
5NT S 100 4100 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
3NT N -630 375 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky

Dlr: W Vul: None
8
16 7 7 10
A 9 A K J 7 6 4 3 2 A 9 7
8 4 2 5 K J 8 5 K 10 8 5 2
J 10 6 4 2 A Q 10 9 7 6 4 3

K Q 7 5 3 Q 10 9 8 3 Q J 6
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1N; NS 6; NS 7; NS 3; EW 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 N 510 250 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
5 N 510 250 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
4 N 510 250 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal
4 N 510 250 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
4 N 510 250 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 N -510 250 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck
5 N -510 250 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
4 N -510 250 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
4 N -510 250 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
4 N -510 250 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky

Dlr: N Vul: E-W
9
2 7 24 7
10 Q 8 7 6 9 8 5 2 10 9 7 6
K 9 7 6 4 3 10 9 4 3 2 Q Q
A A J A K 10 A K J 8 4 3 2

Q J 8 5 2 K 5 J 7 6 4 3 5
Deep Finesse Analysis:
EW 6N; EW 4; EW 4; EW 1; EW 6;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
6 E -1370 125 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
3 E -170 375 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
7NT E 100 4100 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal
6NT E -1440 00 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
3NT E -720 250 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
6NT E 1440 4100 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck
3 E 170 125 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
3NT E 720 250 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
7NT E -100 00 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
6 E 1370 375 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky

Dlr: E Vul: Both
10
7 16 13 4
K 10 A 9 5 4 9 8 3 2 10 6 5
A 7 5 4 K J 7 A J 10 5 K 2
Q J 8 2 Q 8 3 2 Q A Q 8 3

9 6 3 10 6 K 7 6 4 J 9 7 4
Deep Finesse Analysis:
EW 5N; EW 5; EW 5; EW 3; EW 4;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3NT E -660 1.538 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
3NT W -660 1.538 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
3NT W -660 1.538 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal
3NT W -660 1.538 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
4 W -650 4100 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3NT W 660 2.562 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck
3NT W 660 2.562 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
4 W 650 00 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
3NT W 660 2.562 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
3NT E 660 2.562 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky

Dlr: S Vul: None
11
10 10 11 9
9 5 2 A 10 8 5 2 Q 8 6 A 8
A Q 10 7 3 Q 9 6 J 10 5 J 5
8 J 3 A K 4 3 2 K 10 6 4 2

K J 6 4 K 7 4 9 7 Q 9 7 3
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1; EW 2N; EW 1; EW 3; EW 2;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3NT W 100 4100 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal
2 W -110 0.513 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
2 S -50 2.563 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
3 E -110 0.513 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
2 N -50 2.563 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2 W 110 3.587 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
2 N 50 1.537 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
2 S 50 1.537 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
3NT W -100 00 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
3 E 110 3.587 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck

Dlr: W Vul: N-S
12
8 9 11 12
A Q 7 2 J 10 8 6 5 3 2 J 7
K 9 8 6 5 4 9 Q J 7 K 6 4
J 3 A 4 2 A 8 6 4 Q 8 3 2

10 K Q 7 K 10 9 5 3 A 10 9 5
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2N; NS 4; NS 1; NS 1; E 2; W 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 N 650 3.588 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal
4 N 650 3.588 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
2 W -110 00 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
4 N -100 125 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
1 W 50 250 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 N -650 0.512 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
1 W -50 250 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
2 W 110 4100 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
4 N -650 0.512 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
4 N 100 375 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck

Dlr: N Vul: Both
13
8 12 14 6
A 7 5 3 2 K 2 J 10 6 3 10 2
K 9 6 4 10 5 K 7 5 K Q J 9
Q J 10 8 Q J A 9 8 4 A 7 6

A 9 8 7 6 4 3 Q 2 8 5 4 3
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1N; NS 2; EW 2; E 2; E 2; W 1; W 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 W 200 375 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal
4 W 100 00 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
4 W 200 375 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
4 E 200 375 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
3 S 140 125 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 W -100 4100 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
3 S -140 375 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
4 W -200 125 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
4 W -200 125 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
4 E -200 125 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck

Dlr: E Vul: None
14
13 15 10 2
Q 10 9 6 10 8 A Q 5 A J 9 2
3 A K Q J 9 6 4 2 K 2 Q 5
A K 7 7 5 3 9 7 6 4 3 K 8

J 8 5 4 2 J 10 8 10 7 6 4 3
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 4; NS 3; E 3N; E 4; EW 2; W 5N; W 5;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 W -450 250 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal
6 W 50 4100 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
5 W -450 250 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
4 W -450 250 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
4 W -480 00 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
6 W -50 00 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
4 W 480 4100 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
5 W 450 250 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
4 W 450 250 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
4 W 450 250 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck

Dlr: S Vul: N-S
15
1 11 9 19
10 9 7 3 J 10 8 6 5 4 3 2 10
Q J 8 4 9 7 A Q J 10 9 J 8
K 6 5 5 3 K 8 7 K 7 6 4 3

A 2 A K Q 4 2 6 A Q 9 5 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2N; NS 4; NS 2; EW 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 S 650 4100 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal
3 S 170 0.513 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
3 S 170 0.513 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
4 S 620 2.563 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
4 S 620 2.563 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 S -170 3.587 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
4 S -620 1.537 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
3 S -170 3.587 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
4 S -650 00 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
4 S -620 1.537 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck

Dlr: W Vul: E-W
16
5 9 16 10
Q 3 2 7 3 2 8 2 Q J 10 7 2
10 9 5 K 6 5 K Q J 6 4 9 4
K 7 6 4 A Q 10 4 7 A K 5 3

A J 8 J 9 8 A 10 9 5 3 8 6
Deep Finesse Analysis:
EW 3N; EW 4; EW 3; EW 3; EW 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
1NT W -120 250 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
3 E -140 0.513 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
2 E -140 0.513 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
3NT E 100 375 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
3NT W 200 4100 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3NT W -200 00 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
2 E 140 3.587 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
1NT W 120 250 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
3NT E -100 125 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
3 E 140 3.587 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff

Dlr: N Vul: None
17
12 10 14 4
K 6 5 10 8 2 K 2 A Q 7 3 2
Q 7 2 K 7 5 4 3 A J 9 8 4
A J 9 4 A Q Q 6 3 J 10 8 6

10 8 3 J 9 6 10 7 5 4 K 9 5
Deep Finesse Analysis:
EW 3N; EW 4; EW 5; E 3; EW 1; W 4;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2 W -140 1.538 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
3 E -140 1.538 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
1 W -170 00 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
1NT E -120 375 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
3NT E 200 4100 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3NT E -200 00 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
1 W 170 4100 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
2 W 140 2.562 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
1NT E 120 125 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
3 E 140 2.562 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff

Dlr: E Vul: N-S
18
6 12 15 7
A 9 7 2 J 6 10 7 4 J 9 7 2
6 5 4 A K 10 8 7 2 Q K 4 3
Q Q 9 5 4 3 A K 5 2 A 6 5

K J 10 8 3 J 9 8 6 3 Q 10 8
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1; EW 2N; EW 6; EW 1; EW 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 E -480 1.538 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
4 E -480 1.538 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
4 E -480 1.538 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
4 E -480 1.538 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
4 E -450 4100 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 E 450 00 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
4 E 480 2.562 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
4 E 480 2.562 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
4 E 480 2.562 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
4 E 480 2.562 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff

Dlr: S Vul: E-W
19
4 11 15 10
3 K J 10 8 7 6 4 2 10 9 8 4
K 7 2 9 A J 9 8 7 6 2 K 6
Q J 9 8 5 A Q K 4 Q J 7 2

A 10 6 4 5 3 Q 10 5 3 A 5 3
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 3; E 4N; EW 4; EW 4; E 2; W 5N; W 3;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
5 W 100 3.588 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
5x N -300 125 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
4 E 100 3.588 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
6 N -100 250 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
4 E -620 00 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 E 620 4100 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
4 E -100 0.512 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
5 W -100 0.512 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
6 N 100 250 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
5x N 300 375 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff

Dlr: W Vul: Both
20
11 16 7 6
A J 7 6 5 4 Q 9 7 3 K J 4
K Q 9 8 A J 2 Q 9 6 2 A 10
3 10 6 5 4 A 8 4 3 K 9 6 2

10 2 K 8 10 7 5 Q J 8 7 5 3
Deep Finesse Analysis:
EW 3N; EW 1; E 2; EW 3; EW 1; W 3;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2NT W -120 250 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
2NT W 100 4100 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren
2 N -100 375 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
2 N -200 00 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
2NT W -150 125 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2NT W 150 375 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen
2 N 100 125 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
2NT W 120 250 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
2 N 200 4100 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
2NT W -100 00 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff

Dlr: N Vul: N-S
21
6 8 14 12
6 8 7 5 4 A 7 2 Q 8 7 6 5
A J 8 3 J 9 Q 10 9 3 4 3 2
Q 10 9 7 K Q 3 K 8 5 K J 9

K 5 4 2 A 10 6 2 J 6 4 A 10
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1; EW 3N; E 4; EW 2; E 1; W 3;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 E 150 4100 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
2 W -110 375 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
3 W -140 125 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
2 W -140 125 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
2 E -140 125 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 W 140 375 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
4 E -150 00 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
2 W 140 375 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
2 W 110 125 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
2 E 140 375 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck

Dlr: E Vul: E-W
22
4 11 12 13
Q 5 4 3 2 9 6 5 3 Q 8 6 3
K J 7 K 3 2 A 10 9 8 5 10 9
8 A J 8 7 4 Q J 6 4 A 7 4

A 10 9 6 Q 10 K 7 2 K J 5 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1; NS 1; EW 5N; EW 5; EW 6;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 N -150 250 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
4 E -620 125 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
5 E 200 4100 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
3 E -140 375 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
4 E -680 00 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
5 E -200 00 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
4 N 150 250 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
3 E 140 125 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
4 E 620 375 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
4 E 680 4100 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck

Dlr: S Vul: Both
23
9 8 9 14
K 9 2 K 9 8 7 3 K 9 8 5 3
10 5 4 3 A K 10 7 3 10 4 J 10
Q J 6 2 8 6 5 A Q 7 6 4 2

A 8 7 Q J 9 6 5 4 A Q J 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1N; NS 2; NS 5; EW 1; EW 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2 S 140 4100 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
3 N 130 375 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
4 N -100 125 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
4 S -200 00 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
2 S 110 250 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 N 100 375 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
2 S -140 00 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
4 S 200 4100 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
3 N -130 125 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
2 S -110 250 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck

Dlr: W Vul: None
24
16 9 7 8
A Q 5 2 5 A Q 7 6 3 A 7 2
9 4 3 8 K J 9 K Q 10 8 6 5
7 6 A Q J 9 7 6 3 2 4 9 3

K J 10 8 K 10 4 10 8 5 2 J 4
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2N; NS 4; NS 4; EW 1; EW 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 N -50 00 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
4 E 100 125 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
4 N 420 375 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson
4x E 300 250 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
4 N 450 4100 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 N -420 125 1-Diane Melson-Walter Melson vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
4 N 50 4100 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
4x E -300 250 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
4 E -100 375 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
4 N -450 00 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck

Dlr: N Vul: E-W
25
6 18 6 10
Q 2 J 10 9 5 2 9 5 4 K 9 4
K 4 3 A Q 6 A J 7 6 3 A 2
J 10 9 7 5 4 3 K Q 10 2 10 3

A 8 6 K 8 7 8 Q J 8 7 6 5
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1; S 1; EW 2N; EW 4; EW 4;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
6 E -1370 0.133 1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
4 E -650 1.3834 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
4 S 130 3.8897 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
5 W -600 2.6366 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
6 E 1370 3.8897 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
1-R Douglas Smith-Catherine Beykovsky
4 S -130 0.133 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
4 E 650 2.6366 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
5 W 600 1.3834 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck

Dlr: E Vul: Both
26
11 16 7 6
J 6 5 2 A J 8 7 5 Q J 2 Q
A K Q 9 4 A K 8 4 3 10 5 2
10 8 3 10 3 2 10 A K 8 6 4 3

7 4 K Q 9 6 9 7 6 5 J 9 7
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1; EW 1N; EW 3; EW 2; EW 5;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 E -150 250 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
3 N -200 00 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal
2 W 100 3.588 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
2 W -170 125 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
2 W 100 3.588 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2 W -100 0.512 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
4 E 150 250 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
2 W 170 375 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck
3 N 200 4100 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
2 W -100 0.512 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen

Dlr: S Vul: None
27
8 7 16 9
Q 6 5 4 Q 5 3 A 2 7 6 5 2
K 9 8 3 2 10 9 10 8 7 3 K J
A A J 8 4 2 Q J 5 4 A 9 3

J 10 7 K 7 6 K 9 6 Q 10 8 4
Deep Finesse Analysis:
EW 3N; EW 2; EW 3; EW 4; EW 1;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2 E -110 375 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
3 E -110 375 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal
3NT E -400 00 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
2 E -110 375 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
1NT E -120 125 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3NT E 400 4100 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
2 E 110 125 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
2 E 110 125 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck
3 E 110 125 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
1NT E 120 375 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen

Dlr: W Vul: N-S
28
12 5 11 12
A K J 10 5 10 8 5 2 A 6 3 7
6 4 6 4 3 Q 8 4 Q J 8 5 2
9 7 2 Q J 9 7 J 2 A K 10 3

Q 8 3 A K K 10 9 7 5 9 6 4
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2N; NS 5; NS 2; NS 5;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4 N 620 375 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
2 N 140 125 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal
3 N 200 250 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
4 N 650 4100 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
4 N -100 00 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 N -200 250 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
4 N -620 125 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
4 N -650 00 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck
2 N -140 375 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
4 N 100 4100 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen

Dlr: N Vul: Both
29
5 6 13 16
8 5 4 3 7 6 K 9 Q 9 8 6 4
9 7 A J 8 4 J 10 6 3 2 10 3
K 6 K Q 9 2 A 8 7 5 4 J 2

A Q J 10 2 10 5 3 Q A K 7 5
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 2N; NS 4; NS 4; EW 2; EW 2;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
3 S 170 375 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
3 S 140 250 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal
5x E 500 4100 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
3 S 130 125 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
4 E 100 00 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
5x E -500 00 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
3 S -170 125 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
3 S -130 375 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck
3 S -140 250 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
4 E -100 4100 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen

Dlr: E Vul: None
30
3 7 15 15
J 5 2 7 Q 7 6 3 2 9 7 6 3
Q 10 9 7 4 Q 6 5 J 10 9 5 Q
A K J 9 8 4 2 K 4 K J 10 8

K 8 6 3 A 10 3 A 8 A 5 4 2
Deep Finesse Analysis:
NS 1; EW 2N; EW 4;

N-S

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
2 E -170 3.588 2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff vs.
3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow
4 E -420 1.538 3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey vs.
5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal
4x E -590 00 4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara vs.
2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville
3 E -170 3.588 5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck vs.
4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett
4 E -420 1.538 6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen vs.
6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren

E-W

Contract By Score Matchpoints% Pairs
4x E 590 4100 2-Judy Shaffer-Carolyn Somerville vs.
4-Jacqueline Boggs-John La Cara
2 E 170 0.512 3-Pam Bigelow-Michael Bigelow vs.
2-Ann Ruden-Jeanne Imhoff
3 E 170 0.512 4-Catherine Holland-Penney Burnett vs.
5-Lindley Rhodes-Sylvia Hollenbeck
4 E 420 2.562 5-Dana Levitan-Robin Leventhal vs.
3-Vance Chrystal-Mary Ann Lindsey
4 E 420 2.562 6-Alice Franson-Giles Lauren vs.
6-Anne Kohlman-Karen Kettunen